
GitOps promises faster, safer, more automated cloud deployments.
But there’s a reason so many organizations say the same thing:
“We tried GitOps… and it didn’t work for us.”
The truth?
GitOps does not fail at the platform level.
It fails at the developer capability level.
Teams often implement GitOps as if it’s a deployment engine:
“Put everything in Git and ArgoCD will sync it.”
But GitOps fundamentally changes how software is delivered:
If developers are not trained for this shift, GitOps will fail — no matter how well the platform is built.
Most developers come from an imperative mindset:
“Run this script, deploy this resource, fix this live.”
GitOps requires the opposite:
“Declare the desired state.
Push to Git.
Let the platform reconcile.”
This mental model shift is not intuitive.
Without training, developers:
Training is the only way to create the declarative muscle memory GitOps depends on.
In GitOps, Git isn’t just a repo.
It is:
If developers aren’t trained in:
GitOps becomes unmanageable very quickly.
GitOps touches everyone:
RoleWhat They Must LearnDevelopersdeclarative configs, PR-driven delivery, rollback workflowsDevOpsautomation guardrails, pipelines, policy enforcementPlatform Engineersenvironment models, controllers, reconciliation logicSecuritypolicy-as-code, permission boundaries, secrets workflowsLeads/Managersrelease governance, GitOps change management
GitOps works only when everyone follows the same workflow.
Teams often implement GitOps like this:
❌ “Install ArgoCD → point it at a repo → done.”
But GitOps success looks like this:
✅ Train developers → establish standards → automate safety → enforce guardrails → then deploy GitOps tooling.
GitOps is not a technical adoption.
It is a capability adoption.
If developers don’t understand how GitOps works:
But when teams are trained:
GitOps is a training problem masquerading as a tooling problem.
